Monday, April 30, 2007
FULL FRONTAL NUDITY!
Well, Ben"idict Arnold" Wallace and his Chicago Bulls pulverize and sweep the Miami Heat. Now, the moment I've been waiting for, the Pistons vs. their old All-Star. Pistons vs. Bulls. I pray for a sweep but I'm saying Pistons in 5. I think Miami played absolutely no defense and made the Bulls offense look good. It won't happen this time.
Detroit Lions news. Let's get it out of the way... "What a great draft, they're going to the Superbowl... blah, blah, blah." My prediction? The Lions will make their new WR look bad and he'll be riding the bench somewhere in 3 years. Lions win 5 games this season. A marked improvement.
Well, that's all sports fans.
Friday, April 27, 2007
Oops...
Going to see NEXT tomorrow.
Lions draft day... how will they blow it this year?
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Thinking Thursday?
- I thought the Idol charity event last night was one of the most sincere shows of its type I've seen. It's the first time I've seen the conditions in the third world portrayed accurately and brutally honestly. The plight of children in Africa (and around the world) is just heartbreaking.
- Always find it ironic when Madonna, the author of "Sex", is seen asking for help to stop AIDS.
- Always tough trying to answer the "Why does God let that happen?" question from kids. I know the answer lies in free will and our choice to mess things up. I know if parents were responsible, governments were sincerely interested in their people, and people would get involved we wouldn't have the problems. I know all the resources needed to stop the tragedies are available if people would give and if they could get where they were needed. I know that suffering here isn't the worst thing that can happen to a person I know you could dump a trillion dollars on Africa and you'd still have the same problems. I know my gut reaction is that no matter what I know it still sucks.
- Have you seen the video of George Bush dancing with the African band? I'm not sure what to think. Either, "It so good to see a President not take himself to seriously" or "My gosh this is the most powerful man in the world". But mainly I think, "I just hope he's not having sex (or whatever he'd call it) with interns."
- I had to dance some of the tribal stuff while in Africa. George W. makes me look like John Travolta.
- Rosie's leaving the View. Blogs around the world are mourning.
- Toyota is now the #1 automaker in the world. The good American car maker reply? "Its only for one month." I can't wait for the, "It's only been 20 years", comment.
- John Mcain is now running for President. Look, the guy knows what it's like to be torutured, why's he want to do this to us?
- It seems the Al Gore pushed Carbon Offset industry is a fraud. Shocker.
- A new planet was found 5 billion miles away. Scientist say is might have life! Yeah, and for all we would be able to tell it may have a Wal-mart too.
Well, that's enough almost thinking for this week.
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Idol Talk
Best part of the show? Simon, while touring a food bank, shows actual surprise in meeting "nice" people and discovering that people outside the coasts actually help people. You mean Idol hosting a telethon isn't the only organization helping others in America? And those helping aren't paid! Wow! Stunner. That's what happens when the only Americans you talk to appear on television or movies.
Worst part? The whole "tragedy of the starving poor Americans" thing. Honestly, other than those who are mentally or physically unable to operate in our country we don't have anyone "starving" or "poor" when compared to the best off third world country. People need to get out of the American bubble and that doesn't mean taking a cruise to northern Honduras or backpacking in Europe.
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Monday, April 23, 2007
Can't Pass It Up
10. You don't have the brains or the decency of a human being.
9. I wish you weren't mine.
8. I'm pretty sure you'll never date.
7. You're friends are so much cuter than you.
6. With your complexion maybe we should start considering make-up.
5. Maybe you should start wearing things that are a little more revealing, it may be your only hope.
4. My Hollywood friends think you're a loser.
3. I can't believe the court makes me spend time with you.
2. You're a thoughtless little pig.
1. Are you putting on weight?
If you haven't heard the story try guessing which of the above two he actually said!
Thank you Alec for making me feel like a better father.
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Thinking Thursday?
- Does anyone else find it sad that a pro-life victory is now defined as stopping some babies from having their brains sucked out when they are half-way out of the womb?
- Does anyone else find it sad that the same thing is considered a national tradgedy to the pro-abortion side?
- The length and scope of a violent gun crime is directly proportional to the amount of time another gun can be brought to bear. The difference between the mall shooter a few months back and the Virginia Tech massacre.
- Good news now consist of the temperature rising to about 35 at the end of April and Sanjaya getting voted off American Idol.
- We're getting a good response at www.universaloffsets.blogspot.com
- Should NBC have aired the killers manifesto stuff? I'm just not sure. I'm afraid it will inspire more madness but we also need to be informed.
- What was with the memorial service at VT? It was like a parade of religions none of which offered hope or a reason to value life and hold contradictory views (Muslim: Eh, who knows why it happens. Praise Allah! Buddist: Well, now their suffering is ended and they can start again. Not so bad. Liberal Judaism: We need to love each other and get some gun control.) Yeah, no clue how a guy could feel hopeless, confused, treat life so indifferently, and go crazy on that campus. My favorite comment by someone on it: "What was it UN day at VT?"
- Who's to blame? There's alot to go around. Parents? Rudderless society? Political Correctness? School putting rep over safety? The media culture of violence? The one who we know for sure is to blame is the shooter.
- Finally, boy my predicitons for Idol have been off. Chris not even in the bottom 3 and Sanjaya gone? Oh, and LOST... quite possibly the best series of all time.
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Idol Talk
Last night should have been subtitled: "An Attempt at a Very Special American Idol".
From the minute Seacrest expressed sympathy for the VT famlies to Phil saying, "Country is my genre." It just was awkward.
Then there was Chris giving an awkward shout out to VT and then explaining to Simon that "nasally is a style." Yeah, a bad style of singing. Goodbye Chris.
Sanjaya trying to look like Bruce Springsteen... awkward.
KiKi trying to go country... awkward.
Paula seemingly sober... awkward.
Melinda coming out and doing so much better than everyone else... awkward. Just announce her as the winner.
Finally, after the judges shred Chris, and he follows up with "nasally is a style", then you can see him think, "This isn't working so..." "Hey, I'm really feeling bad for VT." To which Simon is caught... ROLLING HIS EYES!!!! Classic and... awkward.
But the worst thing of the night is after the commercial break Simon comes on and looks like someone is holding a gun to his head as he reads a teleprompter, "Oh, hey and the 3 of us judges would also like to say, uh, VT we feel sad. Real, real, sad. Really. Please forget I rolled my eyes."
Prediciton: Chris is so gone.
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Time Waster Tuesday
Monday, April 16, 2007
Outrage!
But on the good side... I'll be able to watch it bootlegged online a week early.
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Quite Possibly the Most Humanitarian Website Ever
And being the responsible person I am I have managed to get a special offer for all you TICS readers. Mention this blog and all offset from Universal Offsets will only be $5! That's quite a deal for making the world a better place with the least amount of effort.
Do your part today!
Thinking Thusday?
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Idol Talk
Who's out?
Either, Phil or Haley. I'm going with Phil because Haley found a way to take off more clothes (the only thing missing in her performance was a stripper pole) and should could go one more week before the the FCC steps in and gets rid of the straight haired 'Ho (will I get kicked off my blog for saying that?)
Monday, April 09, 2007
Polar Bear Prayers
Friday, April 06, 2007
It's not Rage. It's UPS rage.
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Rats, he got me going...
(No rhyme or reason in order or phrasing, but all meant to be applied to one or both of the interviews)
- A simple explanation is not a possiblity
- How we now understand things is correct and won't change radically in the future
- Common materials means a common ancestor and not just a common designer using common materials
- Faith relies on faith
- Genesis 1 time periods can't be literal
- Things can't just have the appearance of age
- If we can't explain it it can't be possible
- There is nothing that will be outside our experience/ability/observations
- If it is outside our expereince/ability/observations we can't just say "we don't know" we must say "it can't be"
- If you have a different idea other than evolution you can't be rational
- The rates at which things progress has always been the same and always will be
- Organized religions and their teachings are the same as Biblical teachings
- My own religious beliefs are the same as Biblical teachings
- I couldn't have reasons, other than science, that could be preventing me from seeing an opposing view (Collins discussion of his fear of accepting Christianity as a scientist was insightful)
- Science=purely rational Reilgious=purely faith they both can't be a mix of both
- Christianity is contradictory and science/scientist are contradiction free
- Contradicitions between Christians and even the same Christian discredits them but contradictions between scientist or even from the same scientist doesn't discredit them
- You can believe in a designerless evolution and still talk of morality and meaning of life and have any credibility or force of athourity
But, the big one is there is/is not a designer.
If you believe there isn't a designer then everthing is grounded on that assumption including the evidence you use to prove your assumptions. Dawkins talk of "there can't be a God because evolution doesn't allow for it" was a great illustration of this. There can be no God because evolution doesn't allow for it and evolution is true because there can't be a God.
If you assume there is a designer then everthing is grounded on that assumption including the evidence you use to prove your assumptions. If I believe there is a designer then simple makes sense.
Either way if you're wrong on that big one everything else you postulate is very likely flawed also.
So I guess the big question is, "Which is the most reasonable assumption? Random eternal processes and matter or an intelligent designer." I don't think the choice is between rational and irrational.
Personally, although I know Dawkins would say it's too simple, if I don't start with a preconcieved bias toward creator or evolutionary process, to look at the complexity around us I'd say a creator is neccesitated (Both scientist (even Dawkins) lean toward this!). We do this in all other areas of life! The more complex a device the more we assume a very intellligent creator not random process. I'll never understand how evolutionist can look at a microscope and say, "Who designed that?" and then look at the whole of creation (which they describe as just a big machine) and say, "Wow! What a cool accident."
Once I accept a designer, to believe He created instantly which gives the appearance of age is really not all that big an unreasonable step. (And differing ages at that! Which is what is shown, if through nothing else, by the difference in age theories depending on what area of science you are studying. Ie. Earth scientist in general say 4.6 billion, Genome scientist say 13.7 billion, astronomers give a different age yet again, and all of them change daily).
I think the key is having an open mind to accept EITHER conclusion. A reasonable person has to admit there COULD be a designer and if there is it fits our observations (the usual argument is "that's just to easy"). A reasonable person has to admit there MIGHT not be a designer and therefore evoltution would be one possible theory of things. (Although in honesty, after re-reading that last sentence, I really don't believe that. I don't see how a reasonable person can't see design in the universe we find ourselves in. So here's my updated sentence) A reasonable person has to admit their version of the designer COULD be wrong.
Collins showed that even from childhood he had been encouraged to keep an open mind and the open mind led him to at least entertain the idea of God and by entertaining the possiblity he was then convinced to believe.
Dawkins seemed predisposed to be anti-designer from the beginning, never gave a hint that he allowed for design to be an option and therefore isn't even able to investigate the evidence objectively. He seemed far more fundamental than the supposed fundamental Collins.
DANG YOU JAMES FOR MAKING ME SPEND THIS MUCH TIME ON A BLOG!!!!!!
Wednesday, April 04, 2007
Idol Thoughts
Haley: Doesn't have enough clothes left to take off to remain in the contest.
Blake: Only unique for a few weeks, now just weak.
Jordin: On the rise the only one who could take...
Melinda: The Professional among a room of amateurs. The only thing that could stop her is looking like she's 50 against Jordin in the end.
LaKisha: Her stars fading. Just doesn't have the "it" factor to win it.
Phil: On and off. Eventually off will dominate.
Sanjaya: Needs to kill someone on camera to be shocking enough to win. He'll be out at about 7 or 6 like all the nerds from past years.
Chris: Only guy with a shot of being in the top 3 where he'll get blown away by the big gun girls.
Prediction (and I've been terrible this year): Phil is gone. Or Gina. No Phil. Pretty sure. Though might be Gina. Oh or Haley.
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
Time Waster Tuesday
http://sodaplay.com/constructor/
Or if you want to spend a couple bucks I'd be interested in playing.
http://www.lasersquadnemesis.com/
Monday, April 02, 2007
Help Me Understand
A new study says, forget it.
Scientists who constructed a massive evolutionary family tree for mammals found no sign of such a burst of new species at that time among the ancestors of present-day animals. Only dead-ender mammals, with no modern-day descendants, showed that effect.
“I was flabbergasted,” said study co-author Ross MacPhee, curator of vertebrate zoology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.
How does this work? I thought if it was being taught in schools we had evidence of what was being taught. It wasn't taught as a theory, it was taught as fact. What exactly were those "facts" based on? And is this an admission that scientist were wrong? Is that possible?